Concerned challenging UT Austin's admission plan. The amicus brief was for respondent UT Austin, arguing for the Court to uphold UT Austin’s admission plan and prior Court opinions holding the educational benefits of diversity are a compelling interest permitting colleges and universities to use in narrowly-tailored individualized review of applicants.
Full Case Title:
- Equal Educational Opportunities
Year:
- Racial Justice
Legal Momentun's Role:
- Joined Amicus Brief
Brief:
Summary of the Case
This case concerned challenging UT Austin's admission plan.
Our Role in the Case
Legal Momentum joined amicus brief was for respondent UT Austin, arguing for the Court to uphold UT Austin’s admission plan and prior Court opinions holding the educational benefits of diversity are a compelling interest permitting colleges and universities to use in narrowly-tailored individualized review of applicants.