Education
If you are being watched, leave now!
-
Determined whether money damages are available under Title IX.
-
Determined whether Title IX, which prohibits sex discrimination by federally funded educational institutions, precludes claims of unconstitutional gender discrimination in the schools.
-
Concerned challenging UT Austin's admission plan. The amicus brief was for respondent UT Austin, arguing for the Court to uphold UT Austin’s admission plan and prior Court opinions holding the educational benefits of diversity are a compelling interest permitting colleges and universities to use in narrowly-tailored individualized review of applicants.
-
Concerning whether UMW violated Title IX by taking no action to investigate cyber harassment on campus.
-
Concerned whether a school violated the federal Equal Access Act by denying a East High Gay/Straight Alliance permission to meet on school premises.
-
Title IX and the Equal Protection Clause prohibit sex discrimination against transgender individuals based on nonconformity to gender stereotypes.
-
Determined the right to sue schools for peer-to-peer sexual harassment under Title IX.
-
Determined whether the NCAA is covered by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
-
Determined whether Title IX covers athletic associations that do not directly receive federal funding, but exercise significant control over federally funded school athletic programs.
-
The plaintiff alleged that she was sexually assaulted by a junior high school teacher for approximately two years. She sued her school under Title IX and various school officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for due process violations.
-
Whether Congress intended for Title IX, the law prohibiting sex discrimination in schools that receive federal funds, to be a private right of action.
-
Determined the right to sue schools for peer-to-peer sexual harassment under Title IX and § 1983.